Thursday, March 02, 2006

Center City Commission Plan Revives Memories

Sometimes, to paraphrase Ross Perot (of all people), in Memphis, we think planning is the same as doing something. If that’s the case, we’ve been really, really busy.

We’re not saying that a sound plan isn’t an instrumental tool in a successful public project. But it’s awfully hard to argue with the folks who say that Memphis leads the nation in the number of plans crowding the shelves that were never implemented.

Not to prejudge today’s announcement by the Center City Commission, but we thought of this again as we read the article about the latest plan being undertaken by that city-county agency - this time, it’s a strategic plan for downtown’s next five years. The fact that the news coverage quoted someone whose title was Center City Commission director of executive programs certainly indicated that some fresh thinking is called for.

It also reminded us of a strategic vision for the Center City Commission that formed about 15 years ago for the future of the downtown redevelopment body. At the time, it was at one of those critical crossroads when the survival of the agency was even in doubt, so it was a point when innovative thought was welcomed and fresh ideas formed. The agency was limping along, and some government and downtown development people began to talk about what the future of the agency should hold and what the Center City Commission should look like.

There was clear consensus. It should get back to basics. It should be private sector-driven. It should focus on fewer priorities. It should get out of the planning business. It should be lean and mean and entrepreneurial.

It should adopt a development mentality. It should measure success in putting together deals, not marketing brochures or studies. It should be less politicized and its board self-perpetuating. It should have a small focused on a few key priorities. It should look for a day when it could end tax freezes and lower the special assessment on downtown businesses.

At the time, one of downtown’s best thinkers put it this way: “We need to quit trying to do everything. We need to pick three priorities and go do them. We need to quit trying to do everything at once. Let’s do three things and when they are done, let’s chose three more and go do them.”

It didn’t seem bold at the time. It just seemed practical. However, things went a different way, leading to an agency that has a staff about three times larger and with two and a half times more politicians on its board.

That said, it’s encouraging that Center City Commission is willing to embark on a process that will consider the best role that it can play, what staff size contributes to the most innovative and entrepreneurial organization and what can produce the most dynamic results for downtown Memphis.

In fairness, the jibes about the agency’s penchant for plans are traced back to something that predates all of the current staff - the more than 20 volumes in its 1984 Center City Development Plan, which was supposed to be the seminal document guiding downtown’s future.

Costing about $500,000 (in 1984 dollars), it barely saw the light of day, largely because the consultants’ team led by Venturi, Scott Brown and Associates Inc. of Philadelphia was not seen as developer-friendly and too rooted in the history of downtown. The final plan – a fascinating compendium of recommendations for downtown’s future – became the poster child for the phrase, “one of those plans gathering dust on a shelf in government.”

It was a fate it did not deserve. It was a thoughtful, articulate plan that treated the heritage of downtown with respect while recommending ways to spark new vibrancy and vitality in the urban core, particularly by building on linkages between the center city and the river.

It was whispered derisively that the lead consultant, Denise Scott Brown, took an egg-headed approach (then again, she does have 10 honorary degrees and has written six books and so many articles that she doesn’t even bother handing out her complete bibliography. In the end, after months and months of public meetings and input, the plan was completed and promptly and quietly filed away.

The money set aside for the executive summary was poached and spent for yet another re-design of Court Square. No executive summary was ever written.

It was an unfortunate decision for Memphis, because with the 1990s came a wave of honors for Brown and her partner Robert Venturi that continues today. The litany of awards recognize them as some of the most influential forces in the past 50 years, and the Harvard University Press credited the pair with influencing architects around the globe.

Yet, in Memphis, the work by the firm was buried away unceremoniously and has never been mentioned again. And because of it, as Venturi and Scott Brown were honored repeatedly, Memphis denied itself the opportunity to tout its downtown’s connections to legends in their fields.

So, today, the announcement of yet another Center City Commission plan may spark its normal round of quips, but in downtown revitalization around the country, hope springs eternal. That’s especially true here. We'd be happy just with more cleanliness, better signage and fewer panhandlers.


mike said...

Nice observations, but you miss the central point. In Memphis these boards and commissions proliferate like ticks on dogs because the folks charged with community leadership don't want the extra work or the lightning strikes of controversy.

Instead our political leaders farm out the responsibility to these low-profile boards and commissions. They largely work in obscurity. Most of them don't want to cause trouble (why lose their jobs?), so they churn out plan after plan to make it look like they are doing something.

It's all a failure of political leadership. I'd suggest closing down a lot of these boards, hiring some extra City Council staff with the savings and expecting the City Council to do their jobs.

But the present system is beneficial to the Council and the commissions, so don't expect change any time soon.

Smart City Consulting said...


We're not sure that the Center City Commission, about to celebrate its 30th anniversary, falls into the category of superfluous boards, but we can agree that there needs to be some sunset provision that brings checks and balances into governmental boards, because they need regular evaluations to determine if they are doing their jobs and whether they are needed any longer.

Footnote: there is no city or county property tax money going to the Center City Commission, so any savings in its budget could accrue to the downtown property owners who pay the special assessment for its operations. We'd bet that these property owners aren't interested in paying for more Council staff.

Thanks for the response.


Carol said...

I was surprised that the Center City Commission didn't believe it had the talent on board to develop a strategic plan internally.

A higher priority, imo, would be a better operational plan for clean, green, safe and retail rentals. Those are not strategic issues. They are operational. You won't find the answers by staging a lot of meetings. You need to find real pros who know how to deliver. Has the CCC ever considered hiring the RDC for clean and green? They seem to be doing an outstanding job in the riverfront parks.

Jay S said...

One thing for sure you do get the same people on many boards just rotating from board to board without making a significant contribution. I see this many times on the few meetings I attend there also seems to be an idea that someone invariably comes up with that gets forgotten about by the next meeting, because it wasn't followed up on. Sometimes it's a wonder anything get's accomplished.

Larry said...

Jay is correct. It is the same people do the same thing ... little to nothing!

Compare the CCC to the River City Company in Chattanooga.

Chattanooga has progress while we all dance around the Mulberry tree.

mike said...

Thanks for catching my error on CCC funding! I'm sure they would like a cut in their assessments.

MC said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Smart City Consulting said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.