Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Taking Our Eye Off The Ball

We’re trying not to overreact to Memphis Mayor Willie W. Herenton’s annual New Year’s bombshell, this time saying that his priority for 2007 is, of all things, a football stadium.

After all, if history repeats itself, by the first of February, it could largely be irrelevant because of the inaction that often follows in the wake of these yearly pronouncements.

At least we hope so.

Where We Rank

It would be difficult to grasp the logic of a new stadium on the best of days, but at the moment that media coverage of Mayor Herenton’s speech began, we were reading Where We Stand: The Strategic Assessment of the St. Louis Region, the analysis by our river city sister of its key social, economic, fiscal, and physical variables.

St. Louis mapped out its competitiveness and quality in life by comparing them to 35 other metros, including Memphis. Just for the record, the others are Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, Denver, Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Chicago, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Nashville, Oklahoma City, Dallas, Austin, Houston, San Antonio, Louisville, Cincinnati, Columbus, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Charlotte, Atlanta, and Miami.

We’re # 1

So, with Mayor Herenton on the TV news talking about a football stadium, here’s a few rankings from the St. Louis report that attracted our attention. Here are the categories where we finished # 1:

• Families headed by single parents – 37.3%

• Families in poverty – 14.9%

• Smallest percentage of adults with advanced degrees – 7.9%

• Smallest number of firms (with employees) owned by African-Americans per 100,000 of African-Americans – 192

• Smallest number of firms (with employees) owned by women per 100,000 of women – 404

• Births to teen parents – 14.7% of total births

• Persons with disabilities living in poverty – 26.9%

• Unwed parents – 46.9%

• Individuals living in poverty – 17.7%

• Children living in poverty – 25.8%

• Metro crime rate – 6,961.3 crimes per 100,000 population

• Metro property crime rate

• Metro violent crime rate

• Fewest arts, entertainment, and recreation establishments per 100,000 – 21.7

A Symbol of Misplaced Priorities

It’s worth mentioning that Memphis was nosed out of the # 1 position, but remained in a strong second place in some other categories: change in the percent of population living outside the principle urban county, children aged 5 to 15 with disabilities, diabetes risk, infant mortality rate, deaths from motor vehicle crashes, lowest percentage of adults with bachelor’s degrees, and subprime refinance loans.

Put simply, we’re hard-pressed to identify any one of these problems that a football stadium would improve. More to the point, in the context of these troubling realities, a football stadium runs the risk of becoming a national symbol of a city that has lost its compass.

It’s not our intent to attack Mayor Herenton. Unlike his public persona, Mayor Herenton is a thoughtful, friendly person, and like the rest of us, he can also be complex and confounding. Too often, in the glare of media coverage and the beat of the blogosphere, people are treated as if they are one-dimensional, and for this reason, we shy away from generalities that seem to deal more with personalities and race than to public policies and alternative plans for the city’s future. That said, there’s no question that a debate on civic priorities right now would be well-timed, because Mayor Herenton’s priorities deserve serious challenge.

Long Ago And Far Away

Looking back, Mayor Herenton’s crowning achievement as mayor was his successful attack on the “tiny towns” legislation that threatened to destroy Memphis and its government. But that was long ago, and it’s hard to stay at the top of your game after 15 years of marriage to one person, much less 15 years as head of an entire city.

Contrary to that impervious attitude that he has so publicly cultivated, Mayor Herenton is well-aware of the growing chorus of people questioning the leadership coming from City Hall. There’s a growing sentiment that Memphis is adrift and an emerging viewpoint that we’re heading directly at an iceberg. Putting a stadium at the top of Memphis’ list of priorities only cements that feeling, particularly considering that a $100 million stadium would cost about $6,000,000 a year in debt service for 20-25 years.

But a new stadium isn’t just the wrong idea at the wrong time for Memphis. It’s also wrong for University of Memphis. That’s because it fosters the perception that the U of M somehow just doesn’t measure up to “real” universities, because it’s dependent on the largesse of city government if it is to have a stadium like other universities.

The Family Reunion

In this way, the proposal perpetuates the University of Memphis’ role as the “red-headed stepchild” in Tennessee’s higher education family. We know that some well-connected UM boosters have been lobbying Mayor Herenton hard for a new stadium to correct their list of grievances about the aging Liberty Bowl Memorial Stadium, but why is it city government’s job to provide a stadium for a state university in the first place?

That’s particularly true for a university that needs some physical symbol that sends a strong message that it is a big-time university. If Mayor Herenton wants to champion a stadium, we think he should organize a unified group of local leaders to descend on Nashville to demand that state government build the U of M its own stadium, just like other universities.

There are dozens of ways that state government trivializes and demeans the University of Memphis in the eyes of its peers and potential students. For this reason, fighting for and winning the funding for a new stadium sends the message that we are finally driving a stake in the ground and demanding equal treatment for our university.

We admit that there are days when we wonder if U of M should even be in the football business at all, but hope never springs quite as eternal as in the hearts of Tiger fans. There’d be no greater symbol of that hope – or an investment in its realization – than getting our university its very own stadium.

Absolutely And Positively Dissimilar

We’re sure that advocates of a new city-funded stadium will cite FedEx Forum as evidence of the positive impact that a new sports facility can have on the community. But the difference between the two is profound and unequivocal.

First and most importantly, the new arena was the entry fee into the NBA, and there’s no pro franchise even hinting that Memphis is an NFL town. It’s a banner year if the stadium approaches 10 events, and thanks to the NBA, the Forum is home to more than 100 events in a year. Second, the vast majority of the funds paying for construction of the Forum comes from non-property tax sources that could be spent no other way, and in the absence of a financing innovation that doesn’t immediately come to mind, a new stadium’s cost would be born largely by property taxpayers. (That’s not to mention that the operating costs of the Forum are paid by the Grizzlies, while the costs at the stadium are paid by city government.) Third, a stadium on the UM campus makes more sense to the economy and character of our city than one on the Fairgrounds, a plat of land more suited to New Urbanism than a new stadium.

If the University needs any encouragement to take up the campaign for its own stadium, the lessons of The Pyramid should prove instructive. (Remember: the university was promised a "state-of-the-art" facility there, too.) At The Pyramid, state government invested about $15 million for the university’s basketball venue – roughly 25 percent of the total cost of the bargain basement facility – and in the end, the university was still treated like a tenant, and today, the return on its investment is precisely zero as the building sits dark on the banks of the river.

Controlling Its Own Destiny

It’s no secret in local government that there is no more demanding tenant for any public building than the university athletic department, so to us, it’s simply the best possible time for the university to control its own destiny with a stadium that it owns and operates.

In a speech in which a new stadium got top billing, a proposal to spend $50 million (over four years) to revitalize neighborhoods became almost a footnote. It’s too bad that such a cancerous city issue received so little attention from City Hall, because as the Brookings Institution pointed out in a report a few months ago, Memphis is also near the top in another ranking – cities hollowing out as the middle class vanishes. In truth, $50 million spent barely scratches the surface in addressing the dimensions of this pervasive problem for our city.

Put simply, there’s plenty to occupy the best and brightest minds in Memphis these days, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. Concentrating on a new stadium is nothing but taking our eye off the ball.


Anonymous said...

Great article with logical sound points...which is exactly why our city officials will not understand anything in it.

Anonymous said...

I love you guys. Great post.

Anonymous said...

"...If Mayor Herenton wants to champion a stadium, we think he should organize a unified group of local leaders to descend on Nashville to demand that state government build the U of M its own stadium, just like other universities.

There are dozens of ways that state government trivializes and demeans the University of Memphis in the eyes of its peers and potential students. For this reason, fighting for and winning the funding for a new stadium sends the message that we are finally driving a stake in the ground and demanding equal treatment for our university...

As an alumnus of another Board of Regents university, I had to laugh at this view of the u. of memphis, as the red-headed step child. Take a look at other TBR institutions and their funding and you will quickly find this is certainly no where near the truth. While it's nice to feel sorry for yourselves and claim 'victim' status, you are only deluding yourselves.

BTW, the state doesn't fund and build football stadiums for its universities. If you folks want a new stadium, fund it yourselves. Student fees is one way to do it, but if I were a memphis student I would want a new stadium built on campus.

Smart City Consulting said...

Actually, requiring U of M to be part of the Board of Regents demeans and trivializes it, as well as the hat-in-the-hand attitude that it requires of its supplicants, not to mention the way that the Board prevents universities like ours from going directly to the legislature for funding for a project like the stadium. And the state puts money into sports facilities, just like it did in Memphis with The Pyramid, for the benefit of its schools.

Smart City Consulting said...

auegocrat, the feeling is mutual, by the way.

sylamore said...

A beautifully concise dissection of our city's woes and our leaders' total inability to articulate a reasonable vision for progress. Memphis is one of America's few remaining links to the Third World. Without real leadership, we are doomed to stay such. The parallels between G.W. Bush and W.W. are striking and instructive. They're both convinced they are on a mission from God, and they're getting similar results from their faith-based leadership.

kovarik said...

the stadium pitch by our once and future? mayor is eerily similar to your story of the bike path on walnut grove road. try as the biking community may, their efforts at dialogue and commmunity crafted solutions fall stillborn as work starts.

for over two years, the community has been in conversation and research (we actually have paid consultants) on the fate of the faigrounds. from out of nowhere, comes the mayor with his take. the city, the state, leaders without vision all geneflect to a community process, but rarely consider its call.

on the one hand, this is a laugher. it's like the sodden uncle at a family event who wakes in the middle of a heated conversation to declare: build a stadium. and sinks back into a daze.

seriously, the community process and product of a central garden green space may have outcomes for all of the number ones and number twos that now mark our city.

Anonymous said...

ショッピング枠 現金化
自動車保険 比較
東京 ホームページ制作
フレッツ 光
マンション フロント
結婚式 演出

Anonymous said...

労働問題 収益物件不動産売却などにはマンション査定土地売買1戸建て売却が含まれる賃貸 住宅不動産 賃貸賃貸マンション新築マンションもしっかりカバーしてありすごく充実したさいとでもちろん投資を目的の方やリフォームをしたい人もすごく参考になるだう。ところで今,SEO対策などいまはやっているがホームページ制作会社にいらいしてもうまくはいかないようだ。最近私は、資産運用にこっていて税金対策にインテリアを集めている。もちろんファッションにこだわりブランド品や下着,ランジェリーにはこだわりがある。 化粧品ダイエット用品高価なものがよく家具も最高級しか買わない、先日海外旅行にいってきてお土産に外車結婚指輪と高級時計をかったが、日本でしらべたら通販ですごく安く売っていた。 物件探しは広島 不動産 岡山 不動産 松山市 不動産 香川県 不動産 徳島 不動産 高知 不動産 高松 不動産をフルカバーしてます大手で 和歌山 富山 滋賀 石川 山梨 新潟 沖縄 大分 鹿児島 宮崎 熊本 高知

Anonymous said...

マンション 投資 マンション 買取 1戸建て 査定 1戸建て 買取 アロマテラピー 甘味処 編物教室 足裏療法(リフレクソロジー)アメリカ車販売 アウトレットショップ あんみつ店 SEO対策 アイスクリームショップ 結婚式場 アクセサリーショップ アウトドアショップ 明石焼き SEO対策 東京 いか焼店 囲碁教室 居合道 イギリス車販売 福岡 賃貸 車買取 自動車保険 バイク買取 美容整形

Anonymous said...

不動産投資 新築マンション 引越し マンション 売却インテリアコーディネータ 不動産 査定 不動産 売買 広島 不動産 システム開発 土壌汚染 webシステム開発 原油 紹介土地 買取 不動産会社 鹿児島 熊本 宮崎 長崎 岡山 沖縄 大分 島根 山口 アロマテラピー 全国 甘味処 全国 編物教室 足裏療法(リフレクソロジー) アメリカ車販売 アイスクリームショップ 結婚式場 アクセサリーショップ アウトドアショップ 明石焼き

Anonymous said...

不動産 買取
マンション 売買 
土地 売却 
札幌 不動産 
仙台 不動産 
大阪 不動産 
横浜 不動産 
名古屋 不動産 
福岡 不動産 
京都 不動産 
埼玉 不動産 
千葉 不動産 
静岡 不動産 
神戸 不動産 
浜松 不動産 
堺市 不動産 
川崎市 不動産 
相模原市 不動産 
姫路 不動産 
岡山 不動産 
明石 不動産 
鹿児島 不動産 
北九州市 不動産 
熊本 不動産 
土地 査定