Sunday, June 17, 2007

Controversy Calls For Less Venom And More Wrangling Of The Facts

We hope Memphis Mayor Willie W. Herenton read the front page of The New York Times yesterday, which bore a headline: “Call Snake Wranglers.”

Apparently, based on the coverage of L.A.’s booming $125 a snake business, he isn’t the only person with snake problems these days, but it seems that he’s the only potential prey that manages to command national attention when he describes his snake problem.

Unfortunately, it’s the rest of us that are feeling snakebit.


That’s because the recent controversy feels like another sorry spectacle that sends a strong message to the rest of the country that we haven’t quite yet managed to reach the level of a banana republic.

That’s not to say that we are taking sides on the merits of the case.

In fact, with this cast of characters, all of us need to resist the rush to judgment that is such a part of today’s reality TV news culture. Instead, we should all take a deep breath – especially the antagonists in this drama – and support the call for an impartial investigation to determine the facts.

By the way, this overriding need for objectivity should immediately eliminate Memphis Police Department as an option for this investigation.


There’s so much that isn’t known, and if anything is clear from what we have seen so far, it’s this:

1) The truth is still out there.

2) Nothing is quite as ugly as when friends fight.
So far, it seems that people’s opinions are dividing along the lines of existing opinions about Mayor Herenton, but more to the point, all of us are owed the unvarnished facts.

Mayor Needs Help

We can’t remember anything quite like this since the days when former Memphis Mayor Wyeth Chandler was going through his “mayor needs help” days.

But unlike those days, this controversy is the perfect storm. It’s not just about sex. It’s also about power, race and money.

Somehow, we have the suspicion that when all the facts finally emerge, this will turn out to be the most overblown piece of political theater in recent history. That’s because when you turn the events and look at them from the various participants’ perspectives, they make sense to a point.

Mining The Facts

The problem is that from that point, the events get obscured by racial factors and personal opinions that make it impossible for us to know what the facts are and make it possible for both sides to interpret the events to support their view of the world.

There’s plenty of reasons to be concerned about all of this, chiefly the negative impact that it has on the city’s already bruised image. It’s hard to imagine how the Chamber of Commerce can successfully sell Memphis in the next couple of months.

On one side, there’s Mayor Herenton, probably the most unpredictable elected official in Memphis’ modern history. Distant, isolated and disconnected, he has the tendency to fall victim more often to his own emotional volatility than he does to any actual plots by others. And, it’s always worth remembering that in the mayor’s world, there is no greater sin you can commit than to disrespect him.

And In This Corner

In the other corner is Richard Fields, former NAACP Legal Defense Fund lawyer and Herenton confidante. Never one to curry favor, he has always tended to say exactly what he thinks, but in recent years, his opinions, especially on some political candidates, have skewed toward extreme, personal assaults.

Back in the day, the two of them shared a foxhole together, fighting the battles for African-American families seeking quality education and equal rights for their children. It was a friendship forged in battle, and for someone like Mayor Herenton, these friendships are inviolable.

In recent years, they have had fights about some issues that chilled the friendship and led to months where they did not speak. It was in this tenuous environment that Mr. Fields scheduled a meeting several months ago to deliver a poll to Mayor Herenton that purported to show that he could not be reelected.

It’s All About Context

In that meeting, Mr. Fields was an emissary for a few local businessmen who are convinced that four more years of the Herenton Administration would be devastating to Memphis. To Mayor Herenton, the meaning was all too clear – it was the ultimate act of disrespect and betrayal.

If someone had set out to create the scenario in which Mayor Herenton would never consider exiting the race, this was it. To add insult to injury, his resolve was strengthened a few weeks later when someone else from the business community came in with a separate poll hostile to the mayor’s reelection’s prospects.

It’s worth adding here that there is hardly any unanimity in the business community about Mayor Herenton’s candidacy. There is a widespread belief that it would be better if Memphis had a new mayor, but there is an equally widespread belief that there is no one in the race who can do any better.

Doing Your Job

As reporters dissect the available facts about this situation, determined to milk the controversy through yet one more news cycle, there is little thought given to the context that sheds light on what could have happened. In particular, it’s worth remembering that Mr. Fields apparently was acting as lawyer for the woman who claims she was recruited to trap Mayor Herenton in a sex scandal (although it’s hard to imagine what that would have to be in this day and time).

Like any experienced lawyer, Mr. Fields knew that there was only one way his client could get her charges reduced – by trading information. This is the time when lawyers set up meetings with FBI agents, and based on his client’s stories – though highly embroidered as they were - about the mayor, drugs and prostitutes, that’s exactly what Mr. Fields did.

One thing is always predictable in these kinds of meetings, and it undoubtedly happened in the one in question. After listening to her story, the agent asked her if she could tape a conversation that would show Mayor Herenton in such a situation, proving that her stories are true.

It’s What They Do

To suggest that the FBI agent was part of a set up is to deny the essential nature of the investigatory agency. Their interest is reflected most dramatically in the dozens and dozens of hours of tapes filed away in U.S. District Court in the cases against local and state elected officials.

How such a meeting ended up in the home of a highly regarded Memphis businessman is another question altogether, but we suspect that all the suspicions are stripped away and the facts are revealed, there is likely to be even a plausible explanation for this.

As for Mayor Herenton, those who ridicule him for his dependable rhetorical flourishes should consider the context for his comparisons of himself to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Life Lessons

It’s worth remembering that the facts of Mayor Herenton’s own life make the comparisons extremely real to him - he attended segregated public schools, he could not attend the University of Memphis because he was black, he was the youngest African-American principal in Memphis, he was the first African-American school superintendent and he was first African-American mayor, entering office to a flood of threats of violence against him.

His feelings about equal rights are just as visceral and life-defining today as when he was a young boy picking cotton to help support his family, and it’s worth remembering that this controversy is being played out against this tableau.

We offer this as explanation, not as justification, for his stultifying news conference last week. Unfortunately, given the chance to act as statesman and to show that Memphis behaves maturely, he managed to do just the opposite.

The Real Risk

Worst of all, he forgot that at the end of the day, this isn’t about him. It’s about our city, and as its mayor, he should not be the instrument of its own ridicule.

What concerns us most is that all of this may in the end reinforce the worst aspects of the mayor’s nature, proving to him that he’s right to trust no one, to isolate himself in City Hall, to limit advice to only a handful of advisers and to suspect that most people are out to undermine his authority.

Right now, it’s our opinion that he’s positioned to be reelected, and if he is, this Elvis-like existence in City Hall will be bad news for all of us and our city.

And yet, we repeat, there is one thing we should all be able to agree on – the need for a thorough, independent investigation. The only proviso we’d add is that it should begin immediately so its results can be released before the city mayor’s elections.


Anonymous said...

I'm glad that you guys got around to addressing this. I had been left to troll for discussions about this on Thaddeus Matthews' blog, and that can be a really soul saddening place (as I am sure you well know). I too think that, absent the entrance of A.C. Wharton into this race, Herenton is likely to win reelection. I also think that this whole episode has been one more straw on the camel's back of Memphis morale. I for one have been toying with the idea of moving- a recent visit to Atlanta really started the itch, but this intrigue has irritated it. The thing about Herenton that really gets me is that he is often capbable of a level of perspective that is completely out of sync with his often street-inflected rhetoric. For instance, he has acknowledged that consilodation would not happen under his stewardship in part because of the resistance to him personally. He has all but stated flat-out that Wharton is more likable, and could therefore get certain things done that he can't. He understands these things but resents them too (apparently). I know his sons personally and I have gathered from conversations with them that Herenton has been concerned for years about the potentional threat that Wharton poses to his continued tenure. I strongly suspect that the other snake Herenton was referring to was Wharton ( I suspected that before Thaddeus posted about it.)

Anonymous said...

"By the way, this overriding need for objectivity should immediately eliminate Memphis Police Department as an option for this investigation."

It certainly should since Godwin will do anything to help Willie get re-elected since he wants to be Director for 4 more years. That is one reason I support police consolidation and an elected Sheriff - removes the mayoral influence that goes on with an appointed police director - we have seen it too many times with Burgess, Crews, and Bolden.

Anonymous said...

Wow. This is the most intelligent and thought out commentary I've read on this situation to date. I will direct those cerebral individuals who want to objectively consider this situation to this site. The rest should just continue their emotional, idiotic rantings over at Thaddeus' place, where I will never again even troll.

Anonymous said...

Memphis is really taking it on the chin, anon 1 said Thaddeus's blog is a "soul saddening Place." I would argue that it is MEMPHIS that is the soul-saddening place. At some point, good friends and family just don't make it worth it to continue residing in this armpit of a city.
You think when a race-baiting 90 year old mayor is battling it out with the last few evil whiteys and the developers have skinned the last taxpayer alive anyone will care?

Anonymous said...

(From Anon 3)
I left the "armpit" that is known as Memphis back in 1998, but I do visit at least once a year, and only then because I have family members there who absolutely refuse to leave. I have never regretted my decision to move away, and "controversies" such as this one only serve to confirm and validate that I did the right thing. The leaving process may be difficult; the "being gone" is heaven!

Anonymous said...

Well, I too left, but after 10 years a family crisis brought me back. Now that the crisis has passed I struggle with the urge to leave almost weekly. If I hadn't moved downtown, I know that I would have moved back to NY or even back to Atlanta. I just hate to leave it when I can see that it is really moving, if ever slowly, in the right direction (at least it is downtown) But the politics, electoral and racial, in Memphis can be so disheartening. I wish the city well, I really do. I just don't know if I am going to be able to stay.

Anonymous said...

Well, Kenneth Whallum got his wish. Carol Johnson is leaving. The city would have been better off with one more of her and one less of him. The man is a clown, a destructive clown, self-impressed clown.

LeftWingCracker said...

And THIS, SCC, is why I don't allow anonymous posting at my site...

Anonymous said...

LWC - and THAT is why you only have the same folks posting over and over.

gsmith said...

I don't see anything wrong with the above anon posts...all are pretty much dead on. Were there some deleted?

Smart City Consulting said...

For the record, we haven't deleted any comments. Somehow, we're missing the issue, too.

We've thought long and hard about anonymous posts, and since we're trying to engage people with direct knowledge of the situation -city/county employees, some elected officials, and some politically-connected businesspeople - we've decided that many of the people we want most to hear from can't leave their names. (Also, we get emails directly from some of them and we know who many of them are.)

Also, we thought that since anyone can make up a name, many of the comments with alleged names are essentially anonymous posts anyway.

At any rate, we've decided that our emphasis is on the discussion, not necessarily who's in it. It's a very egalitarian approach, we think.

Anonymous said...

In your otherwise excellent post about the current Herenton saga, there is an unnecessarily irresponsible and/or incomplete statement about the "business community" that annoys me to no end. The statement reads:

"...There is a widespread belief that it would be better if Memphis had a new mayor, but there is an equally widespread belief that there is no one in the race who can do any better..."

Really? How many members of the "business community" did you survey in order to comfortably make such a statement? Perhaps more importantly, why do many of these business leaders doubt that any one else in the race is capable of doing a better job than Herenton? Please tell us. Intentional or not, your statement is potentially damning to the other candidates. As a former longtime Herenton supporter who is seriously leaning toward supporting another candidate this year, I would desperately like more insight. Why does a sizeable portion of the business community believe that there is no one else in the race who can do better than Herenton?

Smart City Consulting said...

The comment was based on polling that we've seen, and it's certainly supported anecdotally. Here's the calculation: Carol Chumney is defined by what she is against, by her inability to form alliances to get anything done and a tendency toward political oneupmanship. She gives every indication of being someone who could work with no one. As for Herman Morris, there's the general thought that if he couldn't stand up to Mayor Herenton when he was head of MLGW, he doesn't have what it takes to lead the city. However, more importantly, in the end, they don't see either of them having the ability to win the election. We don't necessarily subscribe necessarily to any of these views; we just provide this elaboration in response to your question.

Anonymous said...

Herman Morris did stand up to Mayor Herenton when he was the head of MLGW. That is why he was not reappointed. He refused to compromise his integrity. The CEO of MLGW serves at the "pleasure" of the mayor. If Mr. Morris had not stood up to the mayor, he would have continued to serve. Look at what has happened to Mr. Lee, the person that Mayor Herenton defended almost to the end.

Stop paying so much attention to the news and THINK!