These days, the “Government Watchdog” seems to be doing more whimpering than barking, and all because Memphis Mayor Willie W. Herenton won’t give him an interview.
In recent days, Mike Matthews has petulantly used WREG-TV’s prime air time to fulminate over the fact that the mayor talked to the New York Times rather than to him. Incredibly, these rants apparently meet the station’s definition of news.
All in all, it reminds me of a favorite copy editor who screamed for a reporter to come to the city desk after the editor struck a sentence in the reporter’s copy that said that the mayor wouldn’t give him a comment.
It’s Not About You
The editor screamed: “Why do you think the public cares that you can’t do your job? You’re the reporter. Go get the news and quit giving excuses to readers. They don’t care if the mayor doesn’t like you and won’t return your calls.”
It seems a revolutionary idea in today’s world of modern electronic journalism, but the editor wasn’t through. “Just remember,” he said. “You’re not the news. No one cares if you’re having a hard time doing your job. Quit working yourself into your stories. This isn’t about you.”
That seems a completely alien thought in light of the mixture of journalism and entertainment that frequently passes for the nightly news. Often, it appears that some reporters like the watchdog see the news as a reality show in which they are starring.
Dogging It
Perhaps, this brand of magnified self-aggrandizement is responsible for the latest diatribe about Mayor Herenton’s decision to give the New York Times an interview.
Mr. Matthews told his viewers: “The trouble is recently Willie Herenton has been more accessible to reporters from New York as opposed to reporters from Memphis, refusing to stop and even listen to questions that we wanted to ask about this case.”
In yet another report on his inability to get an interview, he essentially delivered an editorial. “His face was set in a frozen smile,” he intoned. “But Willie Herenton wasn’t happy. He had a group of reporters in front of him ready to ask questions about several issues, but the mayor of Memphis wasn’t in the mood to talk. What he saw were people that were in his way.”
Reading Minds
After basing the first paragraph largely on his mind-reading abilities, the watchdog continued his editorial with a litany of personal grievances, including the mayor’s office’s failure to issue a schedule of events, the lack of easy access to the mayor’s floor in City Hall, the fact that there’s only been one press availability since Mayor Herenton announced the possibility of his resignation to become superintendent, and Mayor Herenton’s failure to comment on the stripper blackmail investigation.
We’re sure that we were supposed to be enraged by the watchdog’s “on your side” reporting, but our only reaction was to shrug. After all, elected officials don’t have an absolute obligation to talk to the reporters, or to every reporter. Instead, they have the right to decide how, when and with whom they want to communicate with the public.
It seems to us that in an environment where leaks are as common as public meetings, a reporter worth his salt could find out what’s going on with or without Mayor Herenton’s help. In other words, it’s all about cultivating sources.
Counter Point
Meanwhile, on the subject of the media and the watchdog, Mayor Herenton offered this perspective:
“I have very little tolerance for games. The media should be professional and present the news in a reliable, unbiased way. I said, ‘Mike, I have no comment,’ and I was smiling. But if you’re in your living room, you hear that the mayor is hostile. He deliberately did that. You probably thought, “There goes Willie Herenton again.
“There has been such a deterioration of objectivity in the media. There are reporters like (Memphis Daily News reporter) Bill Dries who are professional. He’s going to be factual. He’s not going to editorialize. I have some media people who don’t like me. I don’t mind that, but they have the obligation to be accurate.”
We’ve written often about the mayor’s irascibility, but on this particular coverage, it’s hard to argue with him.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
11 comments:
Where are the quotes coming from? Did you guys interview the Mayor?
Mr. Matthews,
You remind me of my ten year old. Grow up and become professional. This is a blog it does purport to be the news. I enjoy reading the insights of this writer. I never watch the local "news" because it is not.
George
Excuse me; It "DOES NOT" purport to be the news. My error. Wish Mr. Matthews could admit when he makes one.
Gates:
Yes, remarkably, we did talk to the mayor and ask him, and he's made some of these comments in speeches around town. In other words, it's not that hard to come up with them.
It's always amazing how some reporters (but only a handful of them) can dish it out but they sure can't take it. For that reason, we've deleted Mr. Matthews characteristic ad hominem attack for anything approximating the same critique that he gives to others. Because we know that he prides himself on being a professional, we have deleted a comment that made him appear to be spiteful and childish, and we think he deserves better.
And for the record, we believe this is the first time that we've even written about him, and only now because these particular reports did not meet generally accepted journalistic standards. If we were really out to get Mr. Matthews, as he seems to think we are, we could just as easily be writing about him daily.
Also, we appreciate all the emails from other reporters, both print and electronic, who said, right on.
There are other bloggers who've also written about this, so Matthews should look in the mirror rather than attacking everyone else.
If we could buy this guy for what he's worth and sell him for what he thinks he's worth, we could buy the Grizzlies.
The Mayor is a TOTAL idiot, a ticking time bomb and we ALL know that.
Matthews is a goofball reporter, and an embarresment as well.
City goverment is a shambles, sports is valued over education and crime is the soup de jour.
How much lower in the cesspool is Memphis going to sink ?
You know, I don't disagree with your general observations about reporters who are lazy in their jobs. We can thank them in part for Iraq and other ills.
But there is one flaw or ommission in your reasoning. They way you get jerks like the Mayor to talk to you? Be nice, write puff pieces, and take stenography.
So. Which would you rather have?
Bob,
I think you will find that this blog, though not a newspaper or the news, does regularly get info from and about the mayor in question. I also think, if you review this blogs stories on the mayor you will find they are hardly puff pieces.
Bob:
Since several of us here have actually worked as reporters, it's not about being cozy or nice. It's about being fair, accurate, and objective. The choices aren't between reporter or stenographer. They are about having the professional skills - and the sources that teach him that you'll get the story without him - that produce respect in the people you cover. It's not personal. It's just the news.
SCM
Post a Comment