Wednesday, July 05, 2006

The Golden Age Of City Mayors

The following is the City Journal column in Memphis magazine written monthly by our colleague, Tom Jones:

This is the golden age of great city mayors.

In Chicago, Richard Daley transformed “Beirut on the Lake” into one of the world’s great cities - sophisticated, vibrant, seedbed for an astonishing array of enlightened “green” programs.

In Denver and San Francisco, two restaurateurs – respectively John Hickenlooper and Gavin Newsom – transplanted their customer service credo into city services and designed revolutionary programs for the homeless. Also, Hickenlooper’s determined regional fence-mending produced a 70 percent approval rating in the metro area, and he in turn used this reservoir of good will to lead seven counties and 31 cities to pass a sales tax increase to pay for 119 miles of new light rail and commuter trains costing $5 billion.

In Atlanta, Shirley Franklin slashed 1,000 jobs as well as her own salary, convinced 75 companies to analyze city government at no cost and began a 22-mile linear park connecting 45 neighborhoods. Through force of personality, Jerry Abramson convinced Louisville citizens to approve the largest government consolidation in 40 years; New York’s Michael Bloomberg turned a projected $6.5 billion deficit into a $3 billion surplus; Baltimore’s Martin O’Malley developed a unique computerized complaint system making city departments more accountable; Miami’s Manny Diaz moved the city bond rating from junk to A+ while rolling out a six-year program to rebuild the infrastructure; and Washington Mayor Anthony Williams delivered something thought impossible – stability.

In other words, cities are in an epic period of rebirth, and great mayors are the reason. Memphis has had great managers, great motivators and great speakers. But there’s no argument that Memphis has had a mayor who measures up to the standards of today’s great mayors.

Mayor Willie W. Herenton, contrary to critics who tend to blame him for everything from the economic downturn to global warming, flirted with a “Nixon to China” brand of greatness, but in the end, it was not to be and now seems as elusive as his being cheered at halfcourt at FedExForum.

In truth, the concept of Willie Herenton has always been more compelling than the reality of Willie Herenton. To his political base, he has special status as the city’s first African-American mayor, and the voter loyalty attached to that milestone will not be replicated again. To civic leaders, explanations for support have frequently begun with the sentence, “He’s better than….”

When a political brand outstrips personal reality, it’s often a good thing for the politician. The formidable image silences critics, drives public opinion and overwhelms public discussions. In Herenton’s case though, it’s no longer fair to him, and it’s not now fair to the city, because it has mutated into a mythology that polarizes every issue he touches.

The seminal example took place just over year ago when he convened a meeting to consider his innovative proposal for merger of the two local school systems. On that day, he made the best researched and most detailed analysis by a public official of the $1 billion spent locally each year for schools, and he did it all without mentioning once that Memphis is the only major metro area in Tennessee where schools aren’t already consolidated.

And yet, none of the statistics, none of the projections and none of the historical trends were reported. Instead, the media fixated on the fact that the chairs of the city and county school boards – respectively, Wanda Halbert and David Pickler - were petulant no-shows at the meeting.

It was a defining moment in the Herenton Era, because it was at that moment that it became unambiguously obvious that his personality, not his positions or programs, would be the overriding factor defining the news from then on. In this way, it no longer mattered if he was right, because he was robbed of his bully pulpit.

The sad truth of Memphis politics – and it is sad whether you like Herenton or not – is that the mayor no longer has the potential to be great, because the ultimate prisoner of the Herenton myth is now Willie Herenton himself. Because of it, he’s denied the chance to emulate great U.S. mayors who are creating bigger dreams for their cities that every one sees themselves being part of, reaching across political and racial boundaries and inspiring all of their citizens with the confidence to move ahead together.

It is a truism that every city is only one great mayor away from being a great city. No one knows this better than Herenton, and that’s why the question that only he can answer is so tough.

Like the talented boxer that he once was, he knows that he can keep winning, but he also knows that sometimes, the skill is not just in being able to win, but in knowing when it is no longer necessary to be in the ring.

9 comments:

LeftWingCracker said...

He robbed himself of his own bully pulpit and believed his own press clippings.

He has been right on several issues, but each time has had the sensitivity of a belligerent drunk looking for a bar-fight.

simply put, the man couldn't sell air conditioners in the Mojave Desert in the middle of July. He appears with each passing day to stay on as mayor only to flip an upraised middle finger at his critics while the city goes to hell in a handbasket, and it's NOT just his city, it's OURS, too.

This is the tragedy of the Herenton administration.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Brassmask said...

Who are the pretenders that might have a chance of leading Memphis out of the wilderness?

Please don't say Carol Chumney.

Larry said...

I'd like to see Herman Morris take Willie on.

I heard some IBEW jefes say that if Junior loses in November, he'll run for mayor.

If Willie and Junior face off, maybe someone like Chumney could slip in with a plurality ... remember, there is no runoff for mayor.

That's my turn at the rumor mill ...

BraveCordovaDem said...

Thanks you for saying in a much more eloquent way what I was trying to say earlier (SCM June 30).

I'll be one of the "he's better than...." types. I've followed mayors since a teen with Ingram, Loeb, Chandler, and Hackett, i.e., a buffoon, a racist, a little racist, and a visionless maintainer. We must be a great City to have survived this list of bad mayors!

I voted for Herenton the first time and do not regret it. He did have accomplishments in his first two terms but through image and his own personality can no longer bring us together and he cannot be effective.

I don't know who will be opposing Herenton next year. I like all of those mentioned in comments but we do need to gravitate to one candidate even it's our 2nd or 3rd choice. Of course all of this could be avoided if Herenton decides to put Memphis above Herenton.

mike said...

Because I do not live, work, play or own property downtown I do not share your view of Herenton's "accomplishments." But we've had that discussion.

However, this is an excellent summation of the nub of the Herenton "problem." Would that he'd read and heed.

Larry said...

I must agree with Mike. Downtown has benefited greatly during Willie's reign ... mainly at the expense of the rest of the city.

Let's see if Broad Street gets pushed aside for the similiar idea near St. Jude ...

Smart City Consulting said...

Larry: That is indeed a good litmus test for whether we are serious about the future of Memphis. Broad Street has the potential to be the inspiration for a new view of the future for our neighborhoods.

Anonymous said...

If you want to see what's been going on in Memphis, look at the growth of Willie's personal wealth since he ascended to the throne.